The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: America’s Wolves at a Crossroads

For anyone who cares about wildlife, public lands, and the health of America’s ecosystems,
the last several weeks have delivered a complicated mix of hope, frustration, and alarm.

The story of wolf recovery in the United States has always been controversial. Wolves inspire awe in some Americans and anger in others. But regardless of where someone stands politically or culturally, one thing is undeniable: wolves are a foundational species in North America’s ecosystems. Their presence reshapes landscapes, restores ecological balance, and reminds us that true wilderness still exists.

Today, wolf recovery is simultaneously advancing in inspiring ways while also facing renewed political and federal attacks.

This is the good, the bad, and the ugly of wolf conservation in America.

The Good: Wolves Are Returning to Places They Haven’t Been Seen in Generations

Perhaps the most hopeful recent development came from Sequoia National Park, where a gray wolf was documented for the first time in more than a century.

The wolf, known as BEY03F, traveled hundreds of miles across California in search of territory and potentially a mate. Her appearance inside Sequoia is more than just a wildlife sighting. It is a historic milestone.

Gray wolves were eradicated from California by 1924. Their slow return since 2011 represents one of the most remarkable wildlife recovery stories in modern America.

Wolves matter because ecosystems evolved with them

When wolves disappear, prey populations can explode, streamside vegetation can collapse from overgrazing, and entire ecological systems become less healthy. The restoration of wolves in places like Yellowstone National Park famously demonstrated how predators can trigger positive ecological cascades affecting everything from elk behavior to river health.

Now, California may be witnessing the early stages of a similar ecological restoration.

The Sequoia wolf also symbolizes something larger: nature’s resilience. Even after decades of extermination campaigns, habitat destruction, and political hostility, wolves are still trying to come home.

The Bad: Wolf Recovery Faces Growing Political and Federal Resistance

At the same time wolves are naturally reclaiming parts of the West, political pressure against wolf recovery is intensifying.

In Colorado, federal officials have launched a review of the state’s voter-approved wolf reintroduction program.

Back in 2020, Colorado voters narrowly approved Proposition 114, requiring wolves to be reintroduced west of the Continental Divide. It was one of the few examples in American history where citizens directly voted to restore a predator species.

The program has not been without problems.

Livestock depredation has occurred. Ranchers have suffered real economic losses. Compensation costs have risen substantially. Rural communities that opposed the initiative from the beginning remain deeply skeptical.

Those concerns deserve acknowledgment and serious attention.

Successful wolf recovery requires more than simply releasing animals into the wild. It requires durable partnerships with ranchers, investment in non-lethal deterrence, rapid compensation systems, range riders, fencing improvements, carcass removal programs, and collaborative wildlife management.

But there is an important distinction between improving wolf management and undermining wolf recovery altogether.

The danger today is that political opposition is increasingly aimed not at coexistence, but at dismantling recovery efforts entirely.

That would be a mistake.

America has already seen what happens when fear, politics, and short-term economic pressures drive predator policy. Wolves were nearly exterminated across the lower 48 states once before. Repeating that history would represent a profound failure of stewardship.

The Ugly: The Return of Cyanide “Bombs” on Public Lands

If the political attacks on wolf recovery are troubling, the renewed federal embrace of M-44 cyanide devices is something even worse.

These devices — commonly called “cyanide bombs” — are spring-loaded traps that eject sodium cyanide into an animal’s mouth when triggered. They are designed to kill predators such as coyotes, foxes, and wolves.

The name sounds extreme because the reality is extreme.

According to the Center for Biological Diversity, Wildlife Services used cyanide bombs to kill more than 6,500 animals in 2023 before restrictions were imposed on some federal lands. More than 150 of those deaths were unintentional.

These devices have injured pets, harmed non-target wildlife, and even sickened people.

One of the most infamous incidents occurred in Idaho in 2017, when a 14-year-old boy accidentally triggered an M-44 device near his home. His dog was killed. The boy survived only because the wind blew the cyanide away from him.

Yet despite years of controversy and public opposition, federal agencies are again moving toward expanded authorization of these devices on public lands.

This is not wildlife management rooted in modern science or ecological ethics. It is a relic of an older philosophy, one that treated predators as vermin to be eradicated rather than as essential components of functioning ecosystems.

There is something deeply disturbing about using indiscriminate poison devices on lands owned by the American public.

Wolves Are About More Than Wolves

The fight over wolves is really a fight over what kind of relationship Americans want with the natural world.

Do we see public lands primarily as industrial landscapes to be controlled and run for private gain?

Or do we see them as living ecosystems worthy of restoration and protection that provide benefits such as clean air and water to all?

Wolves force us to confront difficult questions about coexistence, acceptance, and stewardship.

They also expose a broader truth: endangered species recovery is fragile.

Species can spend decades clawing their way back from extinction only to have political winds shift overnight. Recovery is not permanent. Conservation victories can be reversed surprisingly quickly.

That is why public engagement matters.

What Concerned Citizens Can Do

If you care about wolves and endangered species recovery, there are meaningful actions you can take:

Submit Public Comments

Federal and state agencies like the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) are legally required to consider public comments during rulemaking and environmental review processes. Thoughtful, respectful comments matter. The USFWS is taking comments on Colorado's Wolf Reintroduction efforts. Send your thoughts in support of Colorado's efforts to the USFWS today. 

Support Conservation Organizations

Groups working on predator coexistence, habitat protection, and legal advocacy rely heavily on public support. Organizations such as the Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, and Wolf Conservation Center play major roles in conservation efforts.

Advocate for Non-Lethal Management

Range riders, guard animals, fladry fencing, carcass management, and compensation programs help reduce livestock conflicts without resorting to extermination. Tell federal and state wildlife agencies to adopt non-lethal management practices.

Contact Elected Officials

Wildlife policy is increasingly political. Let elected leaders know that science-based conservation and biodiversity protection matter to you. Contact the House of Representatives, the US Senate, as well as your state lawmakers and let them know you support wolf recovery efforts.

Support Public Lands

Healthy wolf populations require connected, protected habitat. Supporting national parks, wilderness protections, and public land conservation directly benefits wildlife recovery.

Stay Informed and Speak Up

Much wildlife policy receives little public attention until a crisis occurs. Public awareness can shape outcomes before irreversible decisions are made.

A Final Thought

A wolf walking through Sequoia National Park after more than 100 years should remind us of something important:

Extinction is not always inevitable.

Given enough habitat, enough protection, and enough public will, nature can recover.

But recovery is never guaranteed.

The same country capable of bringing wolves back is also capable of poisoning them, trapping them, and politically dismantling decades of conservation progress.

The future of wolves in America will depend on which vision of stewardship ultimately prevails.

###

Meet Sean Smith, a master of conservation, adventure, and storytelling! This award-winning
conservationist and former National Park and Forest Ranger has trekked through the wilderness of Yellowstone, Glacier, Mount St. Helens, and the North Cascades, keeping nature safe with his trusty ranger hat and boots. But Sean's talents don't stop there. He's a TEDx speaker and even a private pilot.

But amidst all these adventures, Sean's heart beats for storytelling. He's been spinning tales since childhood, and now he writes thrilling national park novels that'll have you hooked from the first page. Imagine the drama and mystery of the mountains combined with the adrenaline of a rollercoaster ride. That's what you'll find in Sean's books, set against the majestic backdrop of Yellowstone, Gettysburg, and Mount Rainier. His most recent thriller is set in Glacier and will drop later this year.

So, if you're craving an escape into the wild, look no further. Grab a copy of Sean's novels and prepare for an unforgettable adventure. These stories will transport you to the heart of the national parks, where danger lurks and heroes rise. Don't miss out! Find all his captivating novels right here and in the QR code included. 

Earth Day: A Reminder Worth Fighting For

Every year on April 22, we celebrate Earth Day, a moment to pause, reflect, and recommit to protecting the only home we’ve ever known. For those of us who love wild places, national parks, and the fragile balance of the natural world, Earth Day isn’t just symbolic. It’s personal.

A Brief History: From Protest to Global Movement

Earth Day began in 1970, born out of a growing awareness that America’s air, water, and land were under siege. Industrial pollution choked cities, rivers caught fire, and pesticides quietly poisoned ecosystems.

The driving force behind the first Earth Day was Gaylord Nelson, a U.S. Senator from Wisconsin who envisioned a nationwide “teach-in” on the environment. On April 22, 1970, 20 million Americans, students, families, workers, took to the streets, parks, and campuses.

That collective action sparked something powerful. Within a few short years, the United States established the Environmental Protection Agency and passed landmark laws like the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and Endangered Species Act.

Today, Earth Day is a global event, observed by more than a billion people in over 190 countries. What started as a protest became a movement and a reminder that democracy, when engaged, can deliver real change.

The Threats We Face Today

If Earth Day began as a response to visible pollution, today’s threats are both more complex, and in some ways, more dangerous.

Climate Change is reshaping the planet in real time. Longer wildfire seasons, shrinking snowpack, rising seas, and intensifying storms are no longer distant projections—they’re headlines. In the West, forests burn hotter and longer. Rivers run lower. Ecosystems strain to adapt.

Toxic Chemicals, including persistent contaminants like PFAS, continue to accumulate in our water, soil, and even our bodies. These aren’t problems you can always see but their impacts are real, long-lasting, and costly.

Biodiversity Loss is accelerating. Species are disappearing at rates not seen in human history, weakening ecosystems that we depend on for food, clean water, and resilience.

And underlying all of this is something less often discussed—but just as critical:

The Health of Our Democracy.

Environmental protection doesn’t happen in a vacuum. It requires functioning institutions, trust in science, transparency, and public engagement. When democratic norms erode, when expertise is dismissed, when public lands are treated as disposable, when citizens disengage, our ability to respond to environmental threats weakens.

The same civic energy that fueled the first Earth Day is still required today.

Why Protecting the Environment Matters: For All of Us

Protecting the environment isn’t just about saving distant landscapes or protecting endangered species. It’s about people.

It’s good for the planet.
Healthy ecosystems regulate climate, filter water, store carbon, and sustain life. Forests, wetlands, and oceans aren’t luxuries, they’re irreplaceable infrastructure.

It’s good for the economy.
Outdoor recreation alone contributes hundreds of billions of dollars to the U.S. economy each year. Clean energy is one of the fastest-growing job sectors. Preventing pollution is almost always cheaper than cleaning it up later, a lesson we ignore at our own expense.

It’s good for our health.
Clean air means fewer asthma attacks. Safe drinking water prevents disease. Access to nature improves mental health, reduces stress, and connects us to something larger than ourselves.

And perhaps most importantly:

It’s good for our future.
Every decision we make today, what we protect, what we restore, what we ignore, shapes the world our children will inherit.

The Earth Day Challenge

Earth Day isn’t just a celebration. It’s a challenge.

The generation that launched Earth Day in 1970 didn’t wait for permission. They organized. They demanded action. And they got results.

We’re called to do the same.

Protecting our environment isn’t a partisan issue, it’s a shared responsibility. Whether it’s supporting policies that reduce pollution, conserving public lands, investing in safer technologies, or simply staying informed and engaged, every action matters.

For those of us who write about wild places, explore them, and draw inspiration from them, the stakes couldn’t be higher.

Because at the end of the day, this isn’t just about the environment.

It’s about who we are, what we value, and whether we’re willing to fight for the places, and principles that define us.

Happy Earth Day.

###

Meet Sean Smith, a master of conservation, adventure, and storytelling! This award-winning
conservationist and former National Park and Forest Ranger has trekked through the wilderness of Yellowstone, Glacier, Mount St. Helens, and the North Cascades, keeping nature safe with his trusty ranger hat and boots. But Sean's talents don't stop there. He's a TEDx speaker and even a private pilot.

But amidst all these adventures, Sean's heart beats for storytelling. He's been spinning tales since childhood, and now he writes thrilling national park novels that'll have you hooked from the first page. Imagine the drama and mystery of the mountains combined with the adrenaline of a rollercoaster ride. That's what you'll find in Sean's books, set against the majestic backdrop of Yellowstone, Gettysburg, and Mount Rainier. His most recent thriller is set in Glacier and will drop later this year.

So, if you're craving an escape into the wild, look no further. Grab a copy of Sean's novels and prepare for an unforgettable adventure. These stories will transport you to the heart of the national parks, where danger lurks and heroes rise. Don't miss out! Find all his captivating novels right here and in the QR code included. 

Independence Hall at 250: A Measuring Stick for Liberty

Inside Independence Hall, the rooms are quiet now. Sunlight falls across worn floorboards where delegates once argued, compromised, and ultimately committed themselves to a radical idea: that legitimate government exists to secure rights, not to grant them. Preserved and interpreted by the National Park Service, Independence Hall functions as a constitutional classroom, one that teaches not only what Americans declared in 1776, but why they felt compelled to do so.

As the nation approaches the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, this place invites comparison. The Declaration is not merely a founding document; it is a measuring stick. It lists concrete grievances, specific abuses of power, that convinced ordinary colonists that liberty was slipping away. Those grievances deserve careful, restrained comparison with modern governance, not as rhetoric, but as civic examination.

Grievances Then: What the Colonists Feared

The Declaration cataloged patterns of conduct by the British Crown that, taken together, amounted to tyranny. Among the most consequential concerns were these:

Unfair and coercive taxation.
Colonists objected not simply to taxes, but to taxes imposed without meaningful consent, financial burdens enforced by distant authority, insulated from accountability.

Meaningless political representation.
Representation existed in name only. Colonial assemblies could be dissolved, ignored, or overridden. Participation without influence proved hollow.

The forced quartering of soldiers.
British troops were embedded among civilians, backed by legal protections that favored the military over the populace. This blurred the line between civil life and state force.

Arrest, detention, and removal without local justice.
Colonists accused of crimes could be transported across the Atlantic to face trial in Great Britain, far from juries of peers, local evidence, or public scrutiny.

These were not abstract complaints. They were practical fears about unchecked power: force without accountability, punishment without due process, and authority increasingly removed from the people it governed.

The Measuring Stick: Parallels Worth Examining

Using the Declaration as a measuring stick does not require claiming equivalence between 1776 and today. It requires asking whether similar patterns of power are emerging, and whether safeguards are holding.

Use of Force Without Clear Accountability

The colonists’ concern with standing armies among civilians was fundamentally about accountability. Who answers when force is misused?

In modern America, concerns have grown, across ideological lines, about extra-judicial use of
force by federal agents, including lethal encounters lacking transparent review. The issue is not whether law enforcement should exist; it is whether force is exercised under clear rules, subject to independent oversight, and constrained by law. A system that cannot credibly investigate itself invites erosion of trust.

Detention and Removal Without Due Process

The Declaration objected to people being seized and transported beyond the reach of local courts. Today, debates surrounding immigration enforcement raise parallel constitutional questions.

Lawful immigration enforcement is both necessary and legitimate. Nations have borders; laws must be enforced. But mass detention or deportation without meaningful access to hearings, counsel, or judicial review implicates core protections embedded in the Fourth and Fifth Amendments and the ancient safeguard of habeas corpus. Efficiency cannot substitute for due process without cost to liberty.

Concentration of Executive Power

The Declaration condemned the accumulation of powers in a single authority, law-making, law-enforcing, and law-interpreting drifting together.

Modern concerns about executive power, used to intimidate critics, pressure institutions, or bypass legislative and judicial constraints, echo that warning. This concern is not partisan. Conservatives, in particular, have long cautioned against unchecked federal authority. The question is whether institutional guardrails are respected regardless of who occupies office.

Independence Hall as Classroom, Not Relic

Independence Hall does not instruct visitors what to think; it teaches how to think about power. It reminds us that liberty erodes not only through dramatic acts, but through gradual normalization, when exceptions become habits, and urgency becomes justification.

The founders did not reject law enforcement, taxation, or executive authority. They rejected the absence of limits. Their revolution was not against order, but against unaccountable power.

Civic Vigilance at 250

As America marks 250 years since its declaration, the lesson of Independence Hall is not rebellion, it is vigilance.

Read the Declaration's grievances. Measure modern actions against the founder's warnings. Demand accountability without demonization, enforcement without cruelty, and leadership without intimidation.

The Declaration of Independence is still relevant today not because it guarantees perfection, but because it challenges every generation, including our own, to ask whether power still serves liberty, or whether liberty is quietly being asked to serve power instead.

###

Meet Sean Smith, a master of conservation, adventure, and storytelling! This award-winning
conservationist and former National Park and Forest Ranger has trekked through the wilderness of Yellowstone, Glacier, Mount St. Helens, and the North Cascades, keeping nature safe with his trusty ranger hat and boots. But Sean's talents don't stop there. He's a TEDx speaker and even a private pilot.

But amidst all these adventures, Sean's heart beats for storytelling. He's been spinning tales since childhood, and now he writes thrilling national park novels that'll have you hooked from the first page. Imagine the drama and mystery of the mountains combined with the adrenaline of a rollercoaster ride. That's what you'll find in Sean's books, set against the majestic backdrop of Yellowstone, Gettysburg, and Mount Rainier. His most recent thriller is set in Glacier and will drop later this year.

So, if you're craving an escape into the wild, look no further. Grab a copy of Sean's novels and prepare for an unforgettable adventure. These stories will transport you to the heart of the national parks, where danger lurks and heroes rise. Don't miss out! Find all his captivating novels right here and in the QR code included. 

America at 250: National Parks, the Revolution, and the Ongoing Experiment in Self-Government

This year, the United States marks a milestone: the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. A quarter of a millennium after the thirteen colonies broke from the British Empire, we are still living and benefiting from their bold, unfinished experiment launched in that summer of 1776.

To mark this moment, I’ll be launching a series of blog posts that explore the American Revolution, the subsequent ratification of the Constitution, and the ideas behind these two founding documents, and use the national parks as a lens to focus and center the posts.

Why National Parks?

America’s national parks are more than scenic backdrops or vacation destinations. They are repositories of memory, places where ideals were argued over, defended, tested, and sometimes betrayed. Many parks commemorate Revolutionary War battlefields. Others protect halls of debate, protest sites, migration routes, and landscapes that embody the values the Revolution set in motion: liberty, representation, equality before the law, and civic responsibility.

By grounding this series in national parks, each post will connect place, history, and principle, reminding us that the Revolution was not an abstraction. It happened on real ground, among real people, facing real risks.

The Founders’ Case for Revolution

At the heart of this series will be the question that defined a generation:

Why did the Revolution have to happen?

The founding generation did not rebel casually or impulsively. They argued for years, often fiercely, over whether independence was necessary. Some maintained that a clean break from Great Britain was needed because London based political power had become unaccountable, with colonists' representation in the political process hollow and their fundamental human rights conditional. They believed liberty could not survive under distant authority unchecked by the consent of the governed. Meanwhile, other colonists supported remaining loyal to the British Crown and opposed independence as treason. The political system the colonists operated under, they argued, was flawed but just needed some tweaking. 

Just as importantly, the founding generation arguing for Independence did not claim certainty. What they launched after the war, with the adoption of the U.S. Constitution, was something radical for its time: a self-conscious experiment in self-government, grounded in the belief that free people could govern themselves better than kings or emperors ever could.

An Experiment Still Underway

The American Revolution did not end in 1783. It continues every time citizens vote, protest, serve on juries, speak freely, or hold power to account.

That is why this series will also confront the present.

Alongside historical reflection, posts will examine how the Revolution’s purpose is misunderstood, distorted, or deliberately co-opted in modern political life. We will look at how appeals to “the founders” are often stripped of context, how revolutionary rhetoric is sometimes used to justify authoritarian impulses, and how our democratic institutions are weakened and freedoms undermined in ways the founders would surely condemn. 

What to Expect from the Series

Over the course of 2026, readers can expect posts that:

• Spotlight specific national parks and historic sites tied to Revolutionary ideals

• Examine key moments, arguments, and turning points leading to independence

• Explore the founders’ own doubts, disagreements, and hopes for the future

• Contrast the Revolution’s core purpose with modern efforts to undermine democratic norms

• Ask what it means, here and now, to be stewards of a 250-year-old experiment

Each post will stand on its own, but together they will form a connected narrative: one that treats the Revolution not as settled mythology, but as a living inheritance.

Why This Matters Now

Over the next 12 months, communities across the country will be holding celebrations and events marking the 250th anniversary. It provides us, the beneficiaries of the revolution, with the opportunity to remember and give thanks. But it also offers us an even greater opportunity to honestly reflect and confront the lessons of the revolution. And just as President Lincoln recognized that, despite the horrors of the Civil War, the nation could come out the other side with an opportunity for "a new birth of freedom." An opportunity for its citizens to recommit and more closer to achieving the founders' sacred goal of forming "a more perfect Union." 

At 250, the United States faces questions strikingly familiar to those raised in the 1770s: Who holds political power? Who is accountable? What does liberty require? And what obligations come with self-rule?

By walking the ground where these questions first erupted and by revisiting the arguments that shaped a nation, we can better understand not only where we came from, but what is at stake now.

This series is an invitation: to learn, to question, and to recommit to the idea that the American Revolution was not the end of a struggle for democracy, but its beginning.

###

Meet Sean Smith, a master of conservation, adventure, and storytelling! This award-winning
conservationist and former National Park and Forest Ranger has trekked through the wilderness of Yellowstone, Glacier, Mount St. Helens, and the North Cascades, keeping nature safe with his trusty ranger hat and boots. But Sean's talents don't stop there. He's a TEDx speaker and even a private pilot.

But amidst all these adventures, Sean's heart beats for storytelling. He's been spinning tales since childhood, and now he writes thrilling national park novels that'll have you hooked from the first page. Imagine the drama and mystery of the mountains combined with the adrenaline of a rollercoaster ride. That's what you'll find in Sean's books, set against the majestic backdrop of Yellowstone, Gettysburg, and Mount Rainier. His most recent thriller is set in Glacier and will drop later this year.

So, if you're craving an escape into the wild, look no further. Grab a copy of Sean's novels and prepare for an unforgettable adventure. These stories will transport you to the heart of the national parks, where danger lurks and heroes rise. Don't miss out! Find all his captivating novels right here and in the QR code included. 

TAKE ACTION: Our National Parks Are at Risk: Call Your Senators Today!

The U.S. Senate is poised to vote on a dangerous amendment that could open the door to selling America’s national parks, the very places that define our history, culture, wildlife, and national identity.

Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) has introduced Amendment 3972 to the Interior Appropriations bill. This proposal would strip out longstanding legislative language that currently protects the National Park System from disposal and sale. If this amendment passes, it would send a clear and dangerous signal: that the federal government could sell off national parks to the highest bidder. 

What Amendment 3972 Would Do

Under current law, the Interior Department is required to retain ownership and operation of all National Park Service units, national historic trails, and wild and scenic rivers, ensuring these places remain public lands managed for future generations. Amendment 3972 would remove that requirement from the Interior Appropriations bill. 

That means:

• The Department of the Interior would no longer be legally bound to preserve all existing national park lands as federal land. 

• It would send a signal to the White House and Department of the Interior officials that selling or transferring park units is permissible. 

• National parks, battlefields, seashores, and historic sites, treasured by millions, could be at risk of privatization, transfer to state control, or outright sale.

In short: a vote for Amendment 3972 is a vote to weaken foundational protections for our national parks. 

Why This Matters to Every American

Our national parks are more than scenic landscapes; they are living history and economic engines:

• National parks preserve key parts of our heritage, from Revolutionary War battlefields to iconic geological wonders. 

• Parks deliver enormous economic value. According to the National Parks Conservation Association, for every $1 invested in the National Park Service, communities receive roughly $15 in economic return through jobs, tourism, and local spending. 

• Park tourism sustains local jobs and injects billions into state and local economies every year. 

This isn’t speculative; Americans across the political spectrum overwhelmingly support protecting public lands and national parks, not dismantling them. 

This Threat Is Real — And Happening Now

Advocacy groups, including the National Parks Conservation Association and Western Priorities, are sounding the alarm. If Senator Lee’s amendment passes, it would undermine crucial protections and be a major step toward privatizing land that belongs to all of us. 

We are weeks away from the 250th anniversary of the United States; there is no better time to protect our heritage than now.

Take Action: Call Your Senators Today

Please contact your U.S. Senators today and urge them to vote NO on Amendment 3972 to the Interior Appropriations bill.

Our parks are not for sale. They are not political bargaining chips. They are part of our national identity and legacy.

Here’s what you can tell your Senators when you write/call:

Hello, my name is _____ and I live in _____ (town/state). 

I am urging you to vote NO on Senator Mike Lee’s Amendment 3972 to the Interior Appropriations bill. 

This amendment would strip protections that keep national parks in public hands and could lead to their sale or transfer. Our national parks are treasured public lands that preserve our history and support local economies. 

Please protect them — vote NO. 

Thank you.

Now is the time to act. Pick up the phone, make the call, and tell your Senators that America’s national parks are not for sale.

###

Meet Sean Smith, a master of conservation, adventure, and storytelling! This award-winning
conservationist and former National Park and Forest Ranger has trekked through the wilderness of Yellowstone, Glacier, Mount St. Helens, and the North Cascades, keeping nature safe with his trusty ranger hat and boots. But Sean's talents don't stop there. He's a TEDx speaker and even a private pilot.

But amidst all these adventures, Sean's heart beats for storytelling. He's been spinning tales since childhood, and now he writes thrilling national park novels that'll have you hooked from the first page. Imagine the drama and mystery of the mountains combined with the adrenaline of a rollercoaster ride. That's what you'll find in Sean's books, set against the majestic backdrop of Yellowstone, Gettysburg, and Mount Rainier. His most recent thriller is set in Glacier and will drop later this year.

So, if you're craving an escape into the wild, look no further. Grab a copy of Sean's novels and prepare for an unforgettable adventure. These stories will transport you to the heart of the national parks, where danger lurks and heroes rise. Don't miss out! Find all his captivating novels right here and in the QR code included.