National Park Blog: 2025

Thursday, October 23, 2025

What a Shutdown Does to Our Parks: Overflowing Bins, Fragile Landscapes, and Strained Gateways

When Congress lets funding lapse, America’s National Parks don’t simply “pause.” They fray out loud and in public. As of October 23, 2025, we’re more than three weeks into a federal shutdown, and many parks remain nominally open with minimal staff. The combination of open gates and closed services creates predictable problems on the ground, ecological harm that can take years to repair, and real economic pain for gateway towns that depend on managed, not chaotic, park traffic.

What visitors are actually seeing

Restrooms and trash: With rangers furloughed and custodial contracts paused, restrooms close or go uncleaned, and trash piles up. That’s not hypothetical; these were signature failures in past shutdowns, and they’re recurring now. Expect closed visitor centers, suspended fee collection, sporadic trash pickup, and unmaintained roads and campgrounds.
Safety & rule compliance: Skeleton crews can’t keep up with crowds. This month, Yosemite’s limited staff has been swamped by surging visitation, with reports of illegal base jumping, unauthorized camping, and swimming in closed areas, exactly what happens when enforcement and education are thin.

Ecological and cultural resource impacts

We’ve seen this movie before. During the record 2018–2019 shutdown, vandals carved rocks, drove off-road through fragile habitat, chopped Joshua trees for illegal camp pads, and left human waste. Former leaders warned that some damage could take centuries to heal. Those same pressure points are in play again today.

Fragile soils & vegetation: Desert crusts and alpine meadows can be crushed by a single illegal vehicle track; repeated hits become lasting scars.
Wildlife disturbance: Overflow crowds and dispersed, poorly supervised camping increase human–wildlife conflict, with knock-on effects during migration and breeding seasons.
Cultural sites at risk: With fewer eyes on the landscape, looting and vandalism spike—damage to petroglyphs, mission-era structures, and historic features is notoriously hard to undo.

The National Park Service’s current contingency plan underscores the problem: only limited, essential functions continue during a lapse; most visitor services and resource management are suspended.

The economic hit to gateway communities

Parks are not just scenery; they’re economic engines. In 2024 alone, park visitors spent about $29 billion in gateway communities, supporting roughly 340,000 jobs and generating $56.3 billion in national economic output. When a shutdown disrupts managed access, closing visitor centers, canceling programs, scaring off visitors for a weekend or a week, the ripple is immediate for hotels, outfitters, restaurants, gas stations, guides, and seasonal workers.

This October, the National Parks Conservation Association estimates parks are losing about $1 million a day in fee revenue, funds that otherwise pay for trail repairs, restrooms, and safety projects. That’s money parks won’t have when the doors fully reopen.

Local news from Texas to California highlights the bind: towns that just posted record spending from park tourism now face cancellations, confusion, or unmanaged surges that strain services and dull the long-term visitor experience those economies rely on.

Community stopgaps and the double-edged sword

States and local partners often step in when the federal government shuts down. Utah announced its “Mighty 5” will remain open with limited services; Arizona and others have previously put up state funds to keep marquee parks staffed at a basic level. Volunteers organize trash pickups and restock toilet paper. Philanthropic groups help with signage and information.

These stopgaps matter, but they cut both ways:

Upside: They reduce immediate harm to resources, keep essential services running, and help small businesses survive.
Downside: They risk normalizing a dangerous narrative: “If locals, states, or donors can handle this, why not turn the parks over to the states or even private ventures?” Opponents of federal public-land management point to patched-together shutdown operations as proof that private operators or states could do better. That argument ignores the core Park Service mission, the long-term, science-based stewardship of national treasures and the economies of scale and consistency that a national system requires.

What you can do today

1. Call your Senators, Representative, and the Department of the Interior.

a. Urge them to completely close the National Parks during the shutdown. This is tough to ask, but closing the parks is necessary. Leaving them open without adequate staffing is a slow-motion loss of the very resources we love. Stress that protecting natural and cultural treasures must be paramount, or we risk losing the very values and resources the parks are supposed to protect.

Bottom line

Leaving parks “open” without staffing is not a win for access; it’s a slow-motion loss of the very resources and communities we love. The fix isn’t heroic volunteerism or state lottery stopgaps, it’s Congress doing its job so rangers can do theirs. Until then, the most patriotic thing we can do as concerned citizens is to urge Congress and the Department of the Interior to shut the parks until the budget debate is settled and the federal government re-opens.

###

Meet Sean Smith, a master of conservation, adventure, and storytelling! This award-winning
conservationist and former National Park and Forest Ranger has trekked through the wilderness of Yellowstone, Glacier, Mount St. Helens, and the North Cascades, keeping nature safe with his trusty ranger hat and boots. But Sean's talents don't stop there. He's a TEDx speaker and even a private pilot.

But amidst all these adventures, Sean's heart beats for storytelling. He's been spinning tales since childhood, and now he writes thrilling national park novels that'll have you hooked from the first page. Imagine the drama and mystery of the mountains combined with the adrenaline of a rollercoaster ride. That's what you'll find in Sean's books, set against the majestic backdrop of Yellowstone, Gettysburg, and Mount Rainier. His most recent thriller is set in Glacier and will drop later this year.

So, if you're craving an escape into the wild, look no further. Grab a copy of Sean's novels and prepare for an unforgettable adventure. These stories will transport you to the heart of the national parks, where danger lurks and heroes rise. Don't miss out! Find all his captivating novels right here and in the QR code included.

Monday, October 13, 2025

When Government Websites Turn Partisan: Why the Trump Administration’s Shutdown Messaging Violates the Law and What You Can Do About It

In the days surrounding the 2025 government shutdown, Americans visiting several official federal websites, including those of the Department of Agriculture, Justice, Treasury, State, and Housing and Urban Development, were greeted with to a stunning statement similar to:

Let’s be clear: this is not normal. It’s not legal. And it’s not how a nonpartisan government is supposed to function.

This kind of language, attacking one political party while praising a sitting president by name, represents a direct assault on the Hatch Act. This cornerstone law keeps the civil service free from partisan political manipulation.

What the Hatch Act Is and Why It Exists

Enacted in 1939, the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 7321–7326) protects the integrity of the federal workforce. It ensures that taxpayer-funded offices and employees are never turned into campaign arms for any political party or candidate.

The law prohibits:

Using official authority or influence to affect an election (5 U.S.C. § 7323(a)(1));
Engaging in political activity while on duty, in a federal building, or using government property (5 U.S.C. § 7324(a));
Soliciting or receiving campaign donations; and
Running for partisan political office.

The U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC), an independent agency, enforces these provisions, investigating complaints and, when warranted, pursuing penalties through the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB).

In plain English: federal websites, logos, and offices belong to the American people, not to any political party.

Why These Shutdown Posts Cross the Line

When multiple federal departments display identical language blaming “Radical Left Democrats” and crediting “President Trump,” it’s not an accident. It’s coordination.

And it’s textbook partisan messaging, the very thing the Hatch Act forbids.

Here’s why it matters:

They used official federal resources for partisan advocacy.
Government websites are paid for by taxpayers, not political campaigns.
They misused the authority of public institutions.
A federal agency cannot use its official platform to praise or promote a political leader — especially in the middle of a funding dispute driven by that same leader.
They undermined the trust in our civil servants' impartiality.
Every federal website is supposed to speak with one voice: the voice of service to the American public, not of any political movement or personality.

As ethics experts have warned, this behavior isn’t just improper, it’s likely unlawful under the Hatch Act and OSC’s own guidance on official communications and social media.

Why This Should Matter to Every Citizen

The moment government resources are weaponized for partisan propaganda, democracy itself takes a hit.

Our public institutions depend on credibility, neutrality, and trust.
If agencies can attack political opponents on official channels today, what stops them from silencing dissenting citizens tomorrow?

This isn’t about which party you support; it’s about preserving a government that works for all Americans, not just the ones in power.

What You Can Do Right Now

1. File a Hatch Act Complaint

Every citizen has the right to report potential violations to the U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC), the federal watchdog empowered to investigate and enforce the Hatch Act.

Online: How to File a Hatch Act Compliant
Mail:
U.S. Office of Special Counsel
1730 M Street NW, Suite 218
Washington, D.C. 20036-4505

Provide screenshots, URLs, and the exact language you observed. The OSC can investigate and, if warranted, bring enforcement actions before the MSPB.

2. Contact the Agencies’ Inspectors General

You can also alert the Inspectors General at USDA, DOJ, Treasury, State, and HUD. While IGs don’t enforce the Hatch Act, they can investigate internal misuse of agency resources and preserve evidence.

3. Tell Your Representatives

Demand congressional oversight. The House Oversight Committee and Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee have jurisdiction to investigate violations and call witnesses under oath. Contact information for both Senators and Representatives is here.

4. Spread the Word

Share the facts. Write letters, forward this blog, post responsibly on social media, and talk to friends and neighbors. When citizens shine light on misconduct, accountability follows.

Final Thoughts

The Hatch Act isn’t a technicality; it’s a firewall protecting the line between public service and political power.

When an administration turns federal websites into campaign billboards, it’s not just bending the rules, it’s breaking faith with every American who expects their government to serve, not spin.

Now it’s up to us, the citizens, to defend the law that keeps government honest.
File complaints. Demand answers. Speak up.

Because the moment we stop expecting neutrality from our institutions, we lose it.

###

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

Heading Toward the Brink: Why the Government May Shut Down

As the fiscal year deadline approaches, the United States faces the prospect of a federal government shutdown. If Congress fails to pass a continuing resolution (or full appropriations bills) by midnight on September 30 / October 1, many federal agencies will be forced to scale back operations, furlough non-essential staff, or cease certain activities entirely.

At the heart of the standoff is profound disagreement over both the timeline and the content of what should be included in any stopgap funding legislation.

If no deal emerges, we may see large parts of the federal government grind to a halt, and as we’ll see, public land management agencies would be among those most harmed.

Fallout for Public Lands: National Parks, BLM, Forests, and More

A shutdown is not just an abstract political drama; it has real, immediate consequences, especially for our public lands and environmental stewardship. Below are some of the key impacts:

National Park Service (NPS) and Interior Department Lands

Closures and scale-backs
Under usual contingency plans, most national parks are closed during a lapse in appropriations. Visitor centers, restrooms, campgrounds, and trails are often shuttered. Gates are locked, staff are furloughed, and the public is discouraged from visiting. aspenpublicradio.org+3U.S. Department of the Interior+3National Parks Conservation Association+3 Because parks depend on federal funding, they cannot maintain normal operations during a shutdown. National Parks Conservation Association+1
Damage to resource protection and safety
When parks operate with minimal or no staff, ecological damage accelerates. In past shutdowns, overflows of trash, illegal off-road driving, vandalism, and damage to fragile resources have occurred. aspenpublicradio.org+2National Parks Conservation Association+2 With no staff to monitor or enforce rules, wildlife and habitat suffer. Trails and roads degrade without upkeep. Emergency response (rescue, medical, fire) becomes riskier. aspenpublicradio.org+2National Parks Conservation Association+2
Deferred maintenance, staff cuts, and long-term erosion
Even beyond the shutdown window, parks already face chronic underfunding, staff cuts, and deferred maintenance backlogs. Center for American Progress+2National Parks Conservation Association+2 The Trump administration (and allied agencies) have already engaged in aggressive staffing reductions and budget cuts across Interior agencies, compounding the vulnerability of parks to shutdown stress. Center for American Progress+2aspenpublicradio.org+2

Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Forest Service, and Other Agencies

Open land, but degraded services
BLM lands are more likely to remain physically open during a shutdown, but many visitor facilities (restrooms, visitor centers, staff assistance) will be closed or severely limited. conservationlands.org Trails, roads, maintenance, and resource work may be temporarily suspended. conservationlands.org+1
Increased pressure and cumulative damage
With national parks closed or restricted, public pressure may shift to forests, BLM land, or small state/local natural areas, which themselves are less prepared to absorb surges in visitation. aspenpublicradio.org+1 Understaffed forest and land agencies struggle to control wildfire risk, invasive species, or range management without full capacity.
Delay of permits, research, and restoration work
Projects such as habitat restoration, scientific research, permitting for grazing or infrastructure, and other non-essential agency functions will be slowed or halted.

In short, a shutdown exacerbates the neglect already baked into many environmental and land management systems, and when the shutdown ends, the backlog of damage and deferred care will linger.

Why the Stakes Are High and Why Americans Should Stand Firm

A government shutdown is deeply disruptive. Families lose services, federal workers are furloughed or fired Wikipedia, and agencies falter. But the choice is not simply between “go along to avoid closure” and “stand your ground”: it is about what priorities get protected.

Key arguments for resisting pressure to give away the farm

Protecting vital national priorities
Americans must stand up for those things that too often get cut: environmental protection, climate mitigation, public health, education, social welfare, veterans’ services, and infrastructure. These can’t be treated as second-class items or expendable bargaining chips.
Avoid conceding on health care and social safety nets
The GOP proposal excludes renewed ACA tax credits, reversals of Medicaid cuts, and reversions of recent draconian reductions. Those omissions would worsen health care affordability and access at a time when millions of Americans rely on backstop programs. Accepting that exclusion cedes ground for future budgets.
Leverage in negotiations
The threat of a shutdown is one of the few tools Americans have to prevent a wholly one-sided outcome. If Americans capitulate now, future deadlines will be seen as an opportunity to push for even more extreme cuts. Standing firm sends a message that specific lines can’t be crossed.
Precedent matters
Allowing concessions under threat sets a dangerous precedent. The next time Republicans want to force through a rollback of climate safeguards or veteran benefits, they’ll invoke the shutdown lever again unless challenged.

A realistic temper: Where compromise may still be needed

To be clear: standing firm does not mean being rigidly ideological. There may be room for short-term bridges (e.g. 7–10 day extension) to avoid irreparable harm, particularly in areas like disaster response, VA services, or critical health functions. However, any extension must preserve priority protections and not serve as a blank check to compromise core values.

However, Americans should refuse the giveaway in which service to people is traded off for narrow fiscal dogma.

Conclusion: A Moment of Truth

We are at a moment when very real public interests are at stake. The Trump administration is attempting to centralize power, shrinking social programs, constraining democracy, and weaponizing shutdown threats to get its way. Meanwhile, environmental collapse, climate destabilization, public health emergencies, and educational inequality demand bold, sustained investment.

If Americans allow a government shutdown threat to dictate policy priorities, they will have lost more than merely a funding impasse: they will have conceded their power.

So yes, Americans must stand firm. We should not yield just to keep the machinery running, especially if it means betraying our people and values. A shutdown should be the last option, and should be used only when the alternative is surrender. But in this moment, the alternative is worse.

Let this crisis be a call: Americans, don’t shrink. Hold strong. Ensure that the next resolution funds not only government institutions, but also people, the planet, and justice.

###

Tuesday, September 2, 2025

Preserve our History, Environment and Culture, One Sign at a Time

History lives where we least expect it, on the weathered panels that stand guard beside trails,
perched atop scenic overlooks, and nestled near historic structures in our national parks. But today, these unassuming signboards face a serious threat: the Trump administration’s campaign to reshape and sanitize America’s story.

This isn’t just bureaucratic tinkering. The administration has pressured the National Park Service to review and rewrite interpretive text on exhibits and signage that it deems “anti-American.” In some cases, officials have gone further, asking park visitors to report signs and displays they believe cast the United States in an unfavorable light. Think about that, our national parks, places meant to educate and inspire, are being turned into battlegrounds for ideological purity tests.

What does this mean in practice? It means signs that tell the truth about some of the hardest chapters in our history are at risk:

Civil War battlefields where signs honestly describe slavery as the central cause of the conflict.
Native American sites that acknowledge forced removals, massacres, and broken treaties.
World War II locations like Manzanar, Minidoka, and Tule Lake that tell the painful story of Japanese American incarceration.
Civil Rights landmarks that document the violence and resistance faced by those who fought for equality.
Environmental sites such as Glacier or Everglades, where interpretive text describes how climate change is reshaping ecosystems.
Industrial and mining landscapes where signs explain the damage caused by pollution, clear-cutting, or overuse of natural resources.

Under this campaign, visitors could soon encounter only a whitewashed version of history, one stripped of struggle, diversity, and hard truths. If allowed to stand, this approach reduces our parks to propaganda rather than places of education and reflection. Trump has ordered information deemed inappropriate to be removed by September 17, 2025.

Now more than ever, we must safeguard these echoes of the past before they disappear.

Why It’s Important to Tell the Entire Story

Our national parks are more than scenic backdrops; they are living classrooms that reveal the full scope of America’s natural, cultural, and historic legacy. From the towering sequoias of California to the battlefields of the Civil War, these places tell stories that are both inspiring and difficult. Some celebrate achievement, resilience, and discovery; others confront us with injustice, exploitation, and loss.

If we allow only the comfortable or convenient stories to be told, we lose the richness of our collective past. Interpreting the whole spectrum, beauty and struggle, triumph and tragedy, helps us understand who we are as a nation. It reminds us of what we’ve overcome, and it equips us to confront challenges still before us.

Interpretive signs are one of the most direct ways visitors encounter these lessons. They provide context, amplify diverse voices, and ensure that future generations inherit a history that is truthful, not selective. Preserving these signs is about more than words on a panel, it’s about protecting the integrity of America’s story in all its complexity.

Introducing: The “Save Our Signs” Project

The Save Our Signs initiative is a grassroots effort dedicated to documenting and archiving all history-related interpretive signs across our national parks. Its vision is simple yet powerful: ensure future generations can read, learn from, and reflect on the truths these signs convey, regardless of shifting political winds.

What You Can Do — Today

Visit a national park: Any one will do. From Yosemite to Acadia, every sign tells a story.
Snap a photo: Aim for clarity, capture the entire sign, including any contextual elements like nearby artifacts, structures, or landscapes.
Submit it online: Upload the image (and any notes—location, date, sign text) via the project’s submission portal: Save Our Signs photo submission.

Why this matters:

Public record: Even if signage is altered or removed, your contribution ensures the original remains accessible.
Crowdsourced clarity: A database built by volunteers across the country captures diverse signs from major parks to small sites.
Collective resistance: Taking this small step is a statement. Together, we show that history can’t be erased.

A Call to Action

Calling all history-lovers, hikers, families, park fans, and American patriots, your next trip to a national park can do more than renew your spirit; it can preserve the truth. When you’re there, pause. Look. Photograph.

Tag your photos with something like "SaveOurSigns" if you're sharing on social media, and don’t forget to submit through the project portal so your documentation becomes part of something lasting and impactful.

Here’s how to help move this forward:

Share this post with your friends, local groups, and on social media. Encourage them to visit their local parks ASAP. Encourage folks to capture every sign imaginable, especially those sharing complex or underrepresented histories.
Forward this post to friends, family, and colleagues who work for the National Park Service and other federal land management agencies. They come in contact with our parks' interpretive displays daily. They are in the best position to capture the vast majority of signs. Encourage these park employees to photograph their park's signs before September 17, 2025.

Together, we can build a lasting archive that resists erasure and honors every story that belongs to our national narrative. Visit a park. Take a photo. Save our signs and the history they tell.

###

Monday, August 25, 2025

Celebrating 109 Years of America’s Greatest Idea

Today marks the 109th birthday of the National Park Service (NPS), an institution born on August 25, 1916, when President Woodrow Wilson signed the Organic Act into law. For over a century, the NPS has safeguarded our most cherished landscapes, historic treasures, and cultural landmarks. From the soaring granite walls of Yosemite to the sweeping plains of Yellowstone, from the solemn battlefields of Gettysburg to the coral reefs of Biscayne, our parks embody not only the best of America but also one of the greatest gifts we have ever given the world.

A Gift Across Generations

When our ancestors chose to set aside these lands, they did something extraordinary. They resisted the short-term temptations of exploitation and profit in favor of a legacy that would endure. Timber barons, miners, and railroad magnates all pressed to consume these landscapes. Yet citizens, visionaries, and lawmakers fought instead to protect them for future generations, for their children, and for us.

This was not a gift given lightly. The creation of national parks often came at great personal sacrifice. Advocates like John Muir, Theodore Roosevelt, and countless unnamed rangers, scientists, and citizens gave their energy, and sometimes their livelihoods, to ensure that these places would belong to all people, not just the wealthy or powerful. In doing so, they gave us cathedrals of granite and forests, sanctuaries for wildlife, and classrooms under the open sky.

Lessons from the Field

During my own years working in the national parks, I had the privilege of speaking with thousands of visitors about the park system. Not once did anyone say they wished our ancestors had done less to protect these places. Instead, time and again, people expressed the opposite; they wished our ancestors had done more. More land protected, more history preserved, more wildlife safeguarded. And if that’s what we say today, future generations will surely say the same about us. It is our duty, both to those who came before us and to those who will follow, to do everything we can to protect our national parks.

A Threat to America’s Greatest Gift

Yet as we celebrate this milestone, we must also acknowledge a sobering truth: the long-term survival of our parks is under threat. The Trump Administration has repeatedly attempted to shrink national monuments, open public lands to drilling and mining, slash budgets, and undermine bedrock environmental protections. These moves risk undoing the very covenant our ancestors made on our behalf—that America’s natural and cultural treasures are not for sale or private exploitation, but for stewardship.

The parks cannot defend themselves. They rely on us, citizens, voters, and advocates to ensure they remain protected. Neglect, underfunding, and political hostility could reduce our “greatest idea” to just another line item to be cut or a resource to be exploited.

A Call to Action

On this 109th birthday of the National Park Service, let us not only celebrate but recommit. The best way to honor this legacy is through action:

➡️ Contact your elected officials, especially those in the swing districts listed below, and demand full funding and robust support for our national parks.

Nick Begich (AK - At Large)

David Schweikert (AZ - 1)

Juan Ciscomani (AZ - 6)

Jeff Hurd (CO-3)

Gabe Evans (CO -8)

Don Bacon (NE - 2)

Ryan E. Mackenzie (PA - 7)

Rob Bresnahan Jr. (PA - 8)

Scott Perry (PA - 10)

Derrick Van Orden (WI - 3)

➡️ Remind them that these places are as American as baseball, hot dogs, and apple pie. And that you will remember their votes on national parks when they come up for re-election in 2026.
➡️ Tell them that protecting our parks means protecting our health, our history, our culture, and our children’s inheritance.

America’s national parks are more than vacation spots. They are sacred spaces, cultural treasures, and global symbols of democracy and foresight. On this day, let us celebrate their past and fight fiercely for their future.

###

Tuesday, August 5, 2025

New Leadership, New Resolve: NPCA’s Moment to Defend America’s Parks Without Compromise

Values Worth Fighting For

The National Parks Conservation Association (NPCA) is America’s oldest and largest non-profit dedicated to protecting our national parks. The organization recently announced that Theresa Pierno, its longtime President and Chief Executive Officer, is stepping down. In the press release, Pierno described the decision as “deeply difficult."

In a former chapter of my career, I had the privilege of working for NPCA and under Theresa’s leadership. While I’m no longer directly involved and don’t have insider information, I can say this. If Theresa is anything like I remember, she likely struggled with this decision because of how deeply she believes in the mission. She knows, firsthand, the powerful, often life-changing opportunity NPCA offers its staff and supporters to take meaningful, effective action on behalf of some of America’s most cherished places and ideals.

NPCA has long prided itself on being a nonpartisan organization, describing itself as “the only independent, nonpartisan organization dedicated to advocacy on behalf of the National Park System.” For decades, this approach worked well. By appealing to a broad cross-section of the political spectrum, NPCA helped achieve landmark conservation victories, from wilderness designations to air and water protections. The idea was simple but profound: everyone, regardless of party, should support preserving our shared national treasures.

But today’s political landscape is no longer defined by good-faith debates over the priorities or management of public lands. We now confront a much more existential threat, one in which some factions question whether the federal government should even own or manage public lands at all. This is a fundamentally different fight!

Under the Trump administration, for example, we witnessed a series of unprecedented rollbacks and attacks on public lands and the National Park Service itself. These include proposals to dramatically reduce the number of national parks and monuments, renewed pushes for resource extraction on public lands, censorship of scientific research, the erasure of Black, Indigenous, and other marginalized histories from park interpretive materials, the shuttering of the agency’s premier training facilities, erecting statues to traitors, and the firing or termination of hundreds of career park rangers. These actions aren’t policy tweaks; they are calculated steps to weaken the very foundations of America’s national park legacy.

In that context, Theresa's decision to step aside may reflect a recognition that a new era requires a new kind of leadership.

If NPCA is to remain the nation’s most influential and effective defender of the National Park System, it must reassess its stance on nonpartisanship, at least for now. Being nonpartisan should never mean being neutral in the face of harm. When one side of the political spectrum is actively undermining the park system’s integrity, science, history, and future, staying silent or striving for neutrality can become a form of complicity.

Instead, NPCA must recommit to its core mission and values, and, when necessary, take unapologetically strong positions in defense of the parks. That includes publicly opposing any political administration, regardless of party, whose policies threaten park resources, access, staffing, or public trust. It means mobilizing its members, supporting litigation and legislation, leading protests, and flooding congressional offices with constituent voices demanding better.

Now more than ever, NPCA needs a leader who will not flinch, someone with a bold, visionary, and uncompromising commitment to protecting America’s natural and cultural heritage. A leader who understands that our national parks are not just pretty landscapes or economic engines, but are essential to our national identity, our environmental resilience, and our shared story.

The national park system we know today didn’t emerge by accident. At the time of Yellowstone’s founding, powerful interests sought to privatize, exploit, and develop nearly every acre of the American West. But a few determined individuals like Henry Washburn, Nathaniel Langford, and Ferdinand Hayden pushed back. They believed places like Yellowstone and future parks like Glacier, Gettysburg, and beyond should belong to all Americans, not just the privileged few.

Their vision gave us one of the most admired and imitated public land systems in the world. But that vision is under threat.

If we are to honor their legacy and safeguard these lands for future generations, we must be willing to fight for it. That fight begins now.

If you are a member of NPCA, I encourage you to contact the organization and advocate for a leader who will rise to this moment, someone who understands the gravity of what’s at stake and is ready to act with urgency, resolve, and principles. Our parks deserve nothing less.

The next generation is counting on us.

###