Managing Invasive Species in National Parks: Protecting America's Natural Heritage

Feral Pigs ~ NPS

Invasive species are non-native plants, animals, or pathogens that cause harm to the environment, economy, or human health. Their presence in national parks threatens native biodiversity, disrupting ecosystems and outcompeting indigenous species. The National Park Service (NPS) actively works to manage and remove these invasive species to preserve the natural integrity of these protected areas.

Common Invasive Species in National Parks

1. Emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis): The emerald ash borer is a bright green beetle that feeds on ash trees. Since 2002, it has been responsible for killing tens of millions of Ash trees.
2. Buffelgrass (Pennisetum ciliare): From Africa, it creates dense stands that displace native plants and increase wildfire intensity.
3. Feral pigs: These animals root through soil, damaging vegetation and competing with native wildlife for food.

Why the NPS Works to Remove Invasive Species

The primary goal of the NPS in removing invasive species is to protect native ecosystems and biodiversity. Invasive species can drastically alter habitats, reduce native species populations, and change fire regimes. For instance, invasive plants like Stinknet not only outcompete native flora but also increase the risk of wildfires, which can further devastate the ecosystem.

Controversial Efforts: The Battle Against Stinknet

The fight against Stinknet in Saguaro National Park is one current and controversial effort. This plant may seem harmless with its bright yellow flowers, but it has severe ecological impacts. Stinknet overtakes native wildflowers and poses significant fire hazards. In collaboration with local communities and organizations, the NPS has initiated volunteer plant pulls and public reporting systems to manage its spread. However, these efforts face challenges, including public resistance to herbicide use and the sheer scale of infestation.

Citizen Science and Collaboration

The NPS encourages citizen science and community involvement in managing invasive species. Programs like New River Gorge National Park & Preserve invite volunteers to help monitor and report invasive species, contributing valuable data for effective management. Collaborative projects, such as those that restore amphibian habitats in the Southwest, highlight the innovative and cooperative approaches the NPS employs to combat these ecological threats.

Managing invasive species in national parks is a critical task that requires continuous effort and community engagement. By protecting these treasured landscapes from invasive threats, the NPS ensures that future generations can enjoy America's national parks' natural beauty and biodiversity.

For more information on how to help, visit the National Park Service Invasive Species page.

###

Meet Sean Smith, the master of conservation, adventure, and storytelling! This award-winning conservationist and former National Park Ranger has trekked through the wilderness of Yellowstone, Glacier, and the North Cascades, keeping nature safe with his trusty ranger hat and boots. But Sean's talents don't stop there. He's a TEDx speaker and even a private pilot, soaring through the skies like a bald eagle on a mission.

But amidst all these adventures, Sean's heart beats for storytelling. He's been spinning tales since childhood, and now he writes thrilling national park novels that'll have you hooked from the first page. Imagine the drama and mystery of the mountains combined with the adrenaline of a rollercoaster ride. That's what you'll find in Sean's books, set against the majestic backdrop of Yellowstone, Gettysburg, and Mount Rainier. His most recent thriller is set in Glacier and will drop later this year.

So, if you're craving an escape into the wild, look no further. Grab a copy of Sean's novels and prepare for an unforgettable adventure. These stories will transport you to the heart of the national parks, where danger lurks and heroes rise. Don't miss out! Find all his captivating novels right here and at the included QR code. 

Preserving Paradise: President Biden's New National Monument near the Grand Canyon

U.S. National Park Service

In a move that highlights his commitment to conservation and environmental protection,
President Joe Biden is expected to designated a new national monument near the iconic Grand Canyon in Arizona. This decision is a significant step toward preserving the natural beauty and cultural heritage of this unique region for future generations. 

Preserving a Natural Treasure

The Grand Canyon stands as one of the most awe-inspiring natural wonders on Earth, captivating millions of visitors each year with its breathtaking vistas, intricate rock formations, and rich biodiversity. The proposed monument called Baaj Nwaavjo I'tah Kukveni Grand Canyon National Monument is strategically located near the Grand Canyon, ensuring the protection of vital ecosystems, unique geological features, and cultural resources that contribute to the region's historical and environmental significance.

The newly designated monument will provide a buffer zone against potential development and resource exploitation that could threaten the delicate balance of this ecosystem. By preserving this area, President Biden's administration underscores the importance of maintaining ecological diversity, safeguarding wildlife habitats, preserving cultural and historic resrouces, and promoting sustainable tourism practices.

The Antiquities Act: Empowering Presidential Action

The authority to designate national monuments stems from the Antiquities Act of 1906, a landmark piece of legislation signed into law by President Theodore Roosevelt. This act empowers the President to declare areas of historical, cultural, or scientific importance as national monuments, thereby protecting them from actions that could harm their value. President Biden's decision to designate a new national monument near the Grand Canyon is firmly rooted in this legislation, allowing him to take swift action to safeguard this treasured landscape.

The Greater Importance of National Monuments

The designation of national monuments serves a broader purpose beyond the preservation of specific landscapes. It embodies the United States' commitment to conservation, historical legacy, and shared cultural heritage. These protected areas become living classrooms where visitors can learn about the nation's natural wonders and indigenous histories, fostering a deeper understanding and appreciation of our collective heritage.

Furthermore, the creation of national monuments supports local economies by promoting responsible tourism and outdoor recreation. The influx of visitors generates revenue for nearby communities, helping to build sustainable economies while ensuring that the land's intrinsic value is not compromised.

President Biden's decision to designate a new national monument near the Grand Canyon is a testament to his administration's dedication to environmental stewardship and the preservation of America's natural and cultural treasures. This action, made possible by the Antiquities Act, highlights the importance of safeguarding our nation's most valuable landscapes for current and future generations.

As we celebrate the creation of this new monument, let us also recognize the significance of national monuments across the United States. These areas stand as symbols of our commitment to conservation, education, and the enduring connection between humanity and the natural world. Through these efforts, we can ensure that the beauty of the Grand Canyon and other irreplaceable sites continues to inspire and enrich our lives for years to come.

Watch President Biden's announcement designating the new Grand Canyon monument here. 

###

Meet Sean Smith, the master of conservation, adventure, and storytelling! This award-winning author and former National Park Ranger has trekked through the wilderness of Yellowstone, Glacier, and the North Cascades, keeping nature safe with his trusty ranger hat and boots. But Sean's talents don't stop there. He's a TEDx speaker and even a private pilot, soaring through the skies like a bald eagle on a mission.

But amidst all these adventures, Sean's heart beats for storytelling. He's been spinning tales since childhood, and now he writes thrilling national park novels that'll have you hooked from the first page. Imagine the drama and mystery of the mountains combined with the adrenaline of a rollercoaster ride. That's what you'll find in Sean's books, set against the majestic backdrop of Yellowstone, Gettysburg, and Mount Rainier. His most recent thriller is set in Glacier and will drop later this year.

So, if you're craving an escape into the wild, look no further. Grab a copy of Sean's novels and prepare for an unforgettable adventure. These stories will transport you to the heart of the national parks, where danger lurks and heroes rise. Don't miss out! Find all his captivating novels right here and at the included QR code. 

I focused on the wrong career

Forty eight years ago, my family sat in rapt awe as humanity first set foot on another heavenly body.

I remember it like yesterday, my mom and dad, as well as my brother in our army issued housing huddled around the TV. My dad had set up his 35mm camera on a tripod and snapped countless pictures of the momentous event.

The space program in an odd way set my career path. As many know I always wanted to be an astronaut. But due to the fact that I'm colorblind I couldn't pass the physical to become a military pilot.

However, as this picture shows to land people on the moon or any other significant national undertaking, takes a clear goal, resources, and strong political will. Kennedy set the goal of landing a man on the moon. Two more presidents and subsequent congresses saw that goal to fruition.

Americans and humanity have the capacity to achieve great things. Often the only thing holding us back is the political will to do it.

###

Sean Smith is an award winning conservationist and author. He is a former National Park Ranger at Yellowstone, a TEDx speaker, and private pilot. He graduated from the University of Washington in 1989 with a degree in Political Science. He got his master's in Natural Resources Management from Central Washington University in 1996. He currently runs Washington State's efforts to reduce and eliminate toxic chemicals from consumer products and serves as the Mayor Pro Tem of Covington.

He has been writing stories and books since he was a child and currently writes national park thrillers from the shadow of Mount Rainier.

All his novels can be found here: Mr. Sean D Smith

Dual Mandate? Time for some balance

"Sentinel Bridge & Half Dome" by Jim Getchell 

In August the National Park Service (NPS) will celebrate its 99^th birthday, and begin what’s expected to be a yearlong celebration leading to its centennial in 2016. Americans can expect 365 days of events, speeches, and celebrations. But many are wondering if the centennial will cause the NPS to take a serious look at its management.

The history of the National Park Service’s (NPS) recreation management is a mixed bag at best. Yellowstone, the world's first national park, was set aside in 1872 as "pleasuring-ground" to protect from injury or spoilation, of all timber, mineral deposits, natural curiosities, or wonders within.” Later in 1916, Congress established the National NPS with its primary mission being"....to conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and the wild life therein and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations."

From nearly day one, many have maintained that congress gave the NPS a dual mandate, one that requires the NPS to "balance" preservation with recreation. Yet despite the fact that neither the Organic nor Yellowstone Acts mention recreation specifically, this perceived need to balance conservation with recreation doesn't comply with federal law, court cases or even NPS policy.

Congress recognizing the confusion some had over its original intent in the 1916 Organic Act passed additional legislation that America's National Parks are to be managed as a single system and that no activity is to be authorized "in derogation of the values and purposes for which [the parks] have been established.” In other words, recreation or use can only be authorized if it doesn’t degrade the parks.

The NPS knows they only have one mandate. In its 2006 management policies the agency states "when there is a conflict between conserving resources and values and providing for enjoyment of them, conservation is to be predominant. This is how courts have consistently interpreted the Organic Act." As such, the NPS understands that it can only authorize those activities that are "appropriate" for the national parks.

This language plainly implies that not all activities are appropriate for the park system, or put another way some are inappropriate. Moreover, the guidance implies that the potential list of appropriate activities should be extremely small.

It couldn't be more clear that conservation of park resources is the NPS' primary mission. Yet, despite Congress' intent, the NPS' belief in its dual mandate still persists. Why? 

Sadly, it's because the agency's actual approach to recreation management is far more lax than the law requires and some believe is an abuse of their discretionary authority.

A recent Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request revealed the NPS has not completed even one system wide recreation review. Just as troubling the agency doesn't know of a single park that has ever conducted a comprehensive recreation review either. So, despite Congress' clear intent, it appears the NPS lacks even a basic understanding of recreation impacts.

Yet, this failure to fully investigate likely led to far more liberal recreation management than Congress intended. Sadly, with no information the NPS seems to conclude there is no problem, a kind of see no evil, there is no evil self-perpetuating management cycle.

Without a comprehensive recreation review it’s impossible for the NPS to say it’s complying with its legal mandates to leave park resources unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations.

However, despite this lack of information the NPS nearly every year considers and accommodates new and arguably questionable recreation. In the meantime, the agency has no way of knowing the impact upon the system’s natural wonders and wildlife. Many ask where is the balance?

In 2016, the NPS will celebrate its 100 anniversary. The federal government is already making preparations to rightly celebrate what some have called "America's greatest gift to world culture." Early plans include public events across the country, with an emphasis being placed on reconnecting the people to their parks. Many argue this re-connection is necessary because the parks are losing relevance.

Hogwash! 

Last year the National Park System saw record visitation. Many individual parks like Montana's Glacier broke visitation numbers as well. Americans and the world love the national parks. Why? A case could be made it’s because national parks provide some of the last truly authentic experiences. They are places where one can escape the stress and hassle of everyday life and connect with something bigger.

Sadly, it appears the NPS has forgotten this simple fact, as it moves forward with plans to authorize an ever expanding list of questionable activities, partnerships, and events. Yet we shouldn’t forget the only reason we are able to debate the park system's relevance today, is because our ancestors put aside their short-term wants and desires and set it aside. 

The NPS’ upcoming 100^th anniversary celebration is sure to include many parties, special events, and speeches in honor of its mission. Perhaps to truly honor its mission the NPS should bring actual balance to its management and conduct its first comprehensive recreation review. If it does, future generations are certain to thank us for our foresight. 

Sean Smith is a former Yellowstone Ranger, and an award winning conservationist, TEDx speaker, and author. He writes national park thrillers from his home in the shadow of Mount Rainier National Park. To learn more about his thrillers click here or follow him on twitter: @parkthrillers

Only You Can Protect the North Cascades' Grizzly Bears

The National Park Service (NPS) and Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) are taking comments on a plan that would restore the North Cascades Grizzly bear to a health population.  Currently there it is estimated there are roughly a couple dozen bears that transit the park, crossing the border from Canada.  Studies show that this number is not viable.  Inbreeding is likely rampant which can lead to birth defects and the extinction of the ecosystem's bears.

The NPS and FWS are proposing to supplement the current North Cascades Grizzly bear population with individuals relocated from healthy Canadian populations.  Restoring the grizzly bear to the North Cascades would produce numerous legal, economic, ecological, and recreation benefits.

Please join me in urging the federal government to draft a plan that restores the North Cascades Grizzly bear to health numbers.

Click here to send your letter today.

Thanks,

Sean Smith


Below is the letter I sent to the federal government.  Feel free to use it for yours!

###

To whom it may concern:

I write today in support of the Fish and Wildlife Service's (FWS) and National Park Services (NPS) effort to restore a viable population of Grizzly bears to the North Cascades ecosystem.
Grizzly bears have been a integral component of the North American continent. In the recent past, it was estimated that in America the Grizzly bear population reached 100,000 and ranged from the American plains to the Western coast. Today the remaining few hundred Grizzly bears are limited to a few remote mountainous regions of the country like Yellowstone, Glacier, the Selkirks and the North Cascades.

The FWS and NPS are by law required to preserve and restore endangered and native species. Countless scientific studies and research have shown that viable Grizzly bear habitat exists in the North Cascades and that the few grizzly bears that transit the area do not constitute a viable population.

Besides legal reasons for restoring the bears, there are ecological, economic, recreational benefits to restoring a healthy population. For example, grizzly bears are an indicator species.  Wildlife biologist tell us that if a region has a healthy bear population, its more likely the ecosystem's remaining plants and animals are also robust.  Grizzly bears also have significant economic impacts on areas.  Many visitors from around the globe travel to places like Glacier and Yellowstone with the single purpose of seeing a Grizzly bear in the wild.

Finally, as a former Glacier and Yellowstone park ranger I know recreation and grizzly bears can coexist. People are rightly concerned about traveling in bear country, but simple practices like making noise, traveling in groups, and hanging ones food can significantly improve ones safety.  Moreover, concerns about area closures or exclusions are overblown. These measures are rarely if ever used, and when they are its often for short term reasons such as to protect den sites.
I encourage the FWS and NPS in its draft recovery plan to research the following areas of Grizzly bear recovery:

1. the legal requirements,
2. the ecological benefits,
3. the economic benefits,
4. the recreation impacts,
5. the safety concerns.

Along with the above, and probably most important, I'd ask the FWS and NPS to document the intrinsic benefits of restoring bears.  Grizzly bears if nothing else represent the "wild" part of America that is fast disappearing.  Can we as Americans sustain a few select places where we glimpse the possibility of connecting to something higher.

When I was a park ranger, I often heard from visitors that they appreciated what people like John Muir, Teddy Roosevelt, Aldo Leopold, and Rachel Carson had done to protect our wildlife heritage.  But immediately right after many added, they wished these leaders had done more.  Fair enough, I share that sentiment. But there is nothing we can do about the decisions of are ancestors.  However, we are the ancestors of the future, are they going to look back and say "I wish they had done more to protect the Grizzly bear."  If the North Cascades Grizzly bear recovery plan is done correctly, I don't think so.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Sean Smith

Unleashing Colter's Hell, Sean Smith's first novel out soon

Under the tranquil setting of Yellowstone National Park lies a killer, the world's largest super volcano. Yellowstone erupts roughly every 600,000 years. It's next eruption is overdue, and any present explosion would destroy America and quite possibly all of civilization. Yellowstone, or Colter's Hell, as it's historically known, is experiencing unprecedented volcanic activity, possibly signaling a pending eruption.

In Unleashing Colter's Hell, a religious fanatic sent to the Wyoming wilderness has acquired an atomic bomb to trigger an eruption and spell the end of the United States.

A lone park ranger named Grayson Cole is James Bond, Indiana Jones, and Robert Langdon rolled into one. Along with Diane Harris, a rookie FBI agent, the two are all that stand between the world and its destruction.

Unleashing Colter's Hell is a fast paced, action packed adventure. It's a sweeping story spanning the world from North Korea, thru South America, to Yellowstone the world's first national park. Colter's Hell draws upon modern science, relevant history, present technology, and current events to give the story its terrifying realism.

Look for the book to be out soon.